Does single-sex education boost academic success? Read the arguments for and against. The National Association for Single-Sex Public Education estimates that approximately public schools now offer some form of single-sex education. What is fueling this movement?
Traditionally, same-sex education has been provided by private schools, as almost all U. Today, it has been estimated that there are between and public schools that offer at least some same-sex classes.
There are no consistent, empirical and replicable results that support gender-specific segregation of boys and girls in same-sex classes. However, based primarily on case studies, it has been found that same-sex classes produce positive results for some students in some settings but the long-term impacts of same-sex education on boys and girls, including their social development, is unknown.
Curriculum Organization Overview Traditionally, public schools in the U. These classes typically have variant numbers of students and compositions based on gender. However, the number of public schools adopting same-sex or single-sex education and establishing same-sex classes has been steadily increasing since the late s.
In same-sex classes, students are divided by gender, homogeneously grouped and placed in separate classes of boys and girls.
Beginning in the mids, a few public schools in the United States offered same-sex educational opportunities. Inonly of the public schools with such offerings were completely same-sex in format National Association for Single-Sex Public Education, Girls-only programs were originally designed to insure equitable education for females and to increase their participation and achievement in certain academic areas.
Concern has also developed related to the underachievement of boys, and same-sex classes are proposed to address this problem as well.
Boys-only programs are a more recent phenomenon than girls-only programs and are generally scarcer. Teachers in same-sex classes are able to adopt instructional strategies that are gender-appropriate and gender-inclusive and focus their instruction on the learning style differences of boys and girls.
Same-sex classes may improve the general atmosphere and ethos of learning in classrooms and have become a viable option to better meet the learning needs and increase achievement levels for both boys and girls. Such classes allow boys to better focus on their schoolwork with fewer distractions and permit girls to excel in traditionally male-dominated subjects such as mathematics, science, engineering, computer science, and technology.
There is a rapidly growing vocabulary related to the pedagogical approach and instructional practice of same-sex education.
A variety of terms are used in the educational research literature relating to same-sex classes. This is partially due to the fact that most research on same-sex education has originated in other countries. Although the variant terminology can sometimes be confusing, it causes no serious problems with regard to comprehension or interpretation.
Table 1 summarizes the terminology relating to same-sex education.
As ofthere were only three public schools in the U. Infewer than a dozen public schools offered same-sex instruction Bixler, Schools have since had the legal right to design, develop, and utilize same-sex classes as appropriate to meet the needs and interests of their students Hughes, Bysome five hundred public schools nationwide were offering same-sex instruction Lewin, That year, there were approximately coeducational public schools in the United States that were offering gender-separated educational opportunities National Association for Single-Sex Public Education, Although most of these are same-sex classrooms within coeducational schools, at least US public schools are completely same-sex in format National Association for Single-Sex Public Education, There are still concerns that public schools have not adequately addressed the underachievement of girls in academic areas such as mathematics and science and that there may still exist ongoing gender bias in coeducational classrooms Sadler, ; Streitmatter, Single-sex education: the pros and cons.
Some parents don’t want their children to be in mixed-gender classrooms because, especially at certain ages, students of the opposite sex can be a distraction.
Students in single-sex classrooms will one day live and work side-by-side with members of the opposite sex. Educating students in. Neighbour short essay jobs for the future essay topics (essay my flat zodiac sign) life in the countryside essay narratives, about war essay shopping habits scientific writing essay key pdf article essay sample myself in marathi essay about environment ielts robots Articles about writing an essay numbers.
Benefits of single gender schools argumentative essay. November 25,; Benefits of single gender schools argumentative essay Marathi language essay on population control viridiana diaz dissertation abstract agar main pakshi hota essay writing iitm ms phd application essays, julius caesar essay, database marketing research paper project 5.
Additional research on the effectiveness of single-gender classrooms is necessary, but we all can agree that we need to construct an educational environment that meets the social and intellectual needs of boys and girls. Here are two additional studies from the current research on single-gender education.
Write a persuasive essay or letter in which you argue for or against single-gender classes in middle school.
Support your position by using a variety of persuasive strategies. Negatives of single gender schools essay. 5 stars based on 49 reviews writing censorship essay thesis writing daniel stickler dissertation proposal body wash advertisement analysis essay writing college application essay pollution essay 50 words to describe lse international history phd dissertations.